Being Pushed from the Playing Field

I'd like to continue along the lines of the previous posting. We are all fermiliar with the sports that involve fair verses foul territory. If you're in fowl territory you are "out of bounds" and all that and are penalized. There are certain playing board games such as "Conquest" or whatever that world domination game Marcus had last year, where you move the pieces along pre-set paths. It's not even to enter mind that you deviate from these prescribed spaces. This brings us to models of the Universe, usually done in those green grid lines. There are various proposed shapes of these Universes. For instance if you pick the donut shaped Universe as your model (no doubt Homer Simpson's favorite) you can not move the "playing pieces" into the center hold because IT isn't a part of the Universe. It isn't on the field of play. This truth is more literally illustrated on that Shirlock Holms Startrek episode where Captain Piccard demonstrates to Moriarity what happens when you attempt to throw an object, such as a book off the holograph grid. It just disappears, just like that Jet demonstration in the 9 - 11 video circulating now.

MEET YOUR "SUPER-SELF"

Now I'd like to get into a concept merely hinted at at our last posting. Often you see waves reflect off of the edges of a swimming pool but the principle will work even with swinging a rope of having the ripples reflect back. We proposed that we one and all on Planet Earth may be being "Pushed" from the "Playing Field", which is this universe. Some Force is proposed to be acting on us all that is unproved and not perceptable by our limited means but none the less is quite real in the grand scheme of things. Some may say that Einsteins theory of relativity will not allow for acceleration beyond the speed of light even though most every Scientist now will agree that Black Holes do indeed exist. What they do is provide an "outside force. Some might say they are "unduly influencing the game" just as Moriaritie's calling for "The Arch" in the computer simulation was in all fairness "cheating". So matter is being pulled faster than by all rights it is allowed to go. Last posting we "ran the numbers". The theory I'm proposing now is one, hence, that we have already "mathematically proven". Scientists want a math formula. I've got that. If our souls go out to the year 2061 and then time, space and mass doubles back on itself it doesn't take a genious to deduce that we will at that point begin to live our lives backwards. Our thought process and actions will just run in reverse and we will retrace every step we made during life. Just to review using the "Clark Kent dash principle" we know that for time to alter, mass has to alter to "adjust" to it or nothing makes sense. Hence any negative mass will measure positive, if it also isn't being measured in negative time. The implications of this is that we have a "super-self" living with us all the time. Now we don't know if Jeff Lynne's or Jimmy Pages "super-self" decided to get cute and write backward song lyrics. It could be that John Lennon was at his most creative when his super-self was most active. Since we don't know the mass of the soul- - it's probably zero and besides it doesn't matter anyhow. The question in your minds is "How do we or how did we experiance the consciousness of this Super-self?" Well, there are ways we can sense its presence. For one thing any time you have experianced a bad emotion BEFORE a bad event, or a good emotion BEFORE a good event, or any inter-play of these, you have interracted with your super-self. Your super-self may even be responsable for some of your most brilliant ideas you seemed to get our of nowhere. Your super-self knows the future but regards the past as disputable, much like being influenced by a Joel Olsteen sermon. The past to your Super-self is irrelivent. Only the future is important. This super-self can never be wrong because he isn't GUESSING at the future, he's actually LIVED it.

It then comes into question what happens to objects that are "pushed from the playing field". Logic would dictate that despite Einstein's oppinion on the subject, the foreward vector of motion twords the center of a black hole would indicate that somewhere, somehow, that mass is STILL in the black hole. But this Black Hole is like a sub-routine in the Pascal computer language. It has its own set of variable names and equations. We don't know what consciousness THERE, that is, INSIDE the black hole is like, so we're kind of back to square one in that department. Perhaps if you take Einstein very literally- - nothing indeed survives being "pushed from the field", just like the Holideck of the StarShip enterprize. You can't cheat like Moriarity did and somehow game the system to fool everyone else that you've escaped intact. What we can deduce that your mass logically should be added to that of the Black Hole like every other asteroid and planet and star that falls into it, making the Black Hole grow that much more.

IN THE NAME OF THE FATHER, SON, & THE HOLY SPIGOT

Hey, I was just watching that movie today, give me a break. I would like to talk a little about Greek translations of the Bible and "having a point" and then looking around to cherry pick evidentiary examples to prove it. First of all there is the whole idea of what is your Soul doing when it isn't occupying a body? We don't know but I would presume that it is sleeping. We know from Bhudist teaching that an attribute of knowing the Bhudda is that one is "Awake". We in the past have alerted you that the Greek word for resurrection means "Awake". One might suppose "Awake" as opposed to being "Asleep". This needn't be a physical thing but merely a sorm of psychic awareness. Even Scientology speaks about this. If you are Awake you are truely enlightened, and visa versa. So when Paul and John (not the Beatles) speak of the resurrection, they aren't saying you necessarly have to die and come back to life in order to achieve this state of Awake-ness. You merely have to "find yourself" or encounter with God, or whatever. For the Bible teaches you can experiance the Power of the resurrection RIGHT NOW. It is written "He who believes my words has already passed from death to life".

There are other sentenses that come out comical is taken literally. We know that the word for Spirit means "wind" as per example the "mighty rushing wind" in Acts two, when the Holy Spirit first came. You've seen those movies where a wind blows through a window and somebody responds, "Honey, is that you?" Ghosts and wind are often associated together. Then there is the line, "What's that in the road, a head?" Jesus told the repentant thief on the Cross, "I tell you this today: You will be with me in paradise". In other words "I'm letting you know about your destiny right now, while you are still alive". If you translate it "Today you will be with me in Paradise" you run into some knotty theological problems. Another case is the one about the healing of the blind man in John ch. nine. Jesus answers the authorities "This man's sin originated neither from himself, nor from his parents". This answered their question. But then Jesus goes on to say "But that the glory of God be revealed, I must work and my father works" and after Jesus said this he healed the man. Some would argue that infirmity gives Glory to God, but I strenuously disagree. It all depends on the punctuation of sentenses. There are others such as Mary, a virgin giving birth to a son. Some say that Greek is an annointed translated and even through the original Hebrew word means "Young woman" that the Greek means "Virgin" and we have to go with that. A couple of weeks ago I saw the Jerusalem Bible on my parent's bookshelf and was surprised to find that my own copy of the book was still in a box with my things. This is for people who like their Bible translated out of the original French. They are running adds now for the Geneva Bible, "which is the Bible the pilgrims took with them in 1620. I have a copy of the I Ching that was translated out of the German version. Sometimes if you translate things enough "things" can emerge you never saw before, kind of like the reading of tea leaves. There is a line "All scripture is inspired by God". Other people translate this passage "Every scripture (which is) inspired by God is profitable- - - " ect. ect. I have to go with translation A, knowing a little Greek myself and their grammar. Some people like to pull doctrine from things not in the original text. How often have you heard "Avoid even the appearance of Evil". What the original says is "Abstain from every form of evil". Not the same thing. Of course some people see prophetic things in the most obscure of texts. Some people even say "every prophecy has a near and a far application". This is a cleaver of getting extra milage of scripture which has already been fulfilled. Well, I hope this blog has been helpful.

Next time we will be meeting in the blog "Marcus in Exile". I'll see you there.