Well, President Obama’s spine has again suffered one of those gelatinous attacks, to which he is so vulnerable. He let go Van Jones, the green jobs czar. This was a newly created post in March of 2009. Of course, like is so typical of Obama, he didn’t fire him for unsatisfactory work but because he is too Controversial. So he has been arrested once or twice in his life. He protested the Rodney King verdict. We all did. He said that he was “almost a communist” now. If I didn’t have such a strong background in business finance, I might have made the statement myself. He has used descriptive language about republicans where the expletives were not deleted. And as to his remarks about Columbine and how you never see a minority going psycho like this killing thirteen students, while that’s true. While we’re at it just about all of the mass bombers of note have been White. Since when is it a crime to state the obvious? But it would seem that the statement that got him in the most trouble was that he wanted to see 9 – 11 investigated and he thinks the government was careless in allowing it to happen. I think the same things. Should they throw me in jail? Any time President Obama takes any kind of an affirmative position siding with the left, he always seems to apologize for having said it. But as for me, count me as still firmly in Van Jones’ corner.
This is Tuesday morning September 8, 2009. Obama gave his speech today but getting it on TV was another story. FOX had promised the speech at nine. That would make it at noon in the east. But at nine I checked every TV station and every key radio station and none of them had a hint about it. It was not the conversational topic anywhere. Finally about twelve after nine I got the speech on FOX but suddenly the station was plagued with interference and neither it nor nine would come in more than a second or two without blacking out. This interference went on for the duration of the speech, but now that the speech is over, the station is coming in fine. Tammy Bruce, that expert on hearth and home, proclaimed in her Twitter today that “You parents are your child’s best moral tutor, and not that shady lawyer from Illinois” referring to Obama. Of course Tammy Bruce had absolutely no problem anything Bill Clinton did during his administration, when I was listening to her regularly. These celebrities like Dennis Miller, Star Parker, and Laura Schleshenger, who have fallen off the edge of the earth politically- - I just don’t understand how it happened because all four of these people are latter day converts to the fringe right wing. Of course I read the speech on line last night so I knew what was in it. What struck me was that the speech seemed longer than I was expecting. Newt Gringrich said that was a good speech and for kids to listen to it. Who would guess that Newt Gingrich would be positioned to the left of Tammy Bruce, who as you know likes to put on a dildo when she’s having sex with another woman.
This next paragraph may come off as psychotic ramblings like that Cellist they had on Sixty Minutes who revealed how mentally ill he actually was when he tried to hold his own in an interview. This is because we mentally ill folk see connections in things that ordinary people don’t see any connection with. My overall theme for this paragraph is that there is some all-encompassing “master script writer” for the events in our world. And sometimes these “writers” aren’t all that believable. They are so bent on writing certain “events” into the script that just how they unfold becomes of little concern to them. Like you’ve seen these movies they review on “At the Movies”. It’s a really bad movie and you’ve figured that out and you’re just waiting for the moment when you can leave. But there is some “event” that they “telegraphed” would happen early in the movie and you’re just “waiting for it to unfold” even though when it does you will know you’re already bored and disinterested. A couple weeks ago Stewart Sutcliffe talked with me and he said “No matter what events take place during the Obama administration, we are still Cosmically a lot better off than we would have been under Hillary”. If you are a “believer” in all my “Federation” writings this remark will make perfect sense. For the rest of us (including me) we wonder whether Hillary Clinton would not have been a far more effective standard bearer for the party. What if Hillary people were “out for blood” and wanted to carry the fight to the convention floor. I know party officials dread a prospect like this because they say “It would divide the party”. Oh really? Consider who the opposition turned out to be- - Mc Cain and Palin. With a team like this NO democrat is going to vote for those two over ANY democrat. In a July 2008 blog I wrote “You know right now I just Trust John Mc Cain more than I do Obama”. If the Republicans had gone with a moderate platform and chosen someone like Arlen Specter or Lamar Alexander for Vice President, there are decent odds I would have voted Republican in the last election. But as I have indicated higher up in this file, The Republican ideology seems to have fallen off the surface of the earth lately. Their political positions on any issue are so far “Beyond the Pale” that almost ANY democrat would have gotten my vote last year. Script writers like to screw around with you. Like take the case of Melanie and Philip on “Days of Our Lives”. We all know they had sex and everybody is inclined to blame Melanie for it- - as though Philip was some zombie with no will of his own. But with the facts Melanie had to work with- - who would guess the outcome? Melanie had had it made it clear to her over and over that Philip and Stephanie were through, over, kaput. She had “played the hero” once too often- - waiting on pursuing the relationship with Philip any further- - because she wanted to be absolutely sure. Sometimes no matter what people say, however stridently- - their assertions dissolve into mush and aren’t worth a thing. One of the stupidest Simpson’s episodes was that “1990’s rebellion” one they did about Marge being in College just fifteen years ago. Over and over again she affirmed that what her teachers were saying was true, that men are all pigs and want to hold you back. She was there to learn and expand her mind. You will also remember that other episode where all the Simpson’s women were really smart. They were doctors and researchers and lawyers and such. Given this model- - one would suppose that Marge had something to aspire to. All her life she’d admired an intellectual. And yet all her teacher has to do is make a casual disparaging remark about marriage- - and Marge turns into a “Born Again- - - dimwit”. Suddenly all she wants to do is be the dumbest female on the planet, as well as have far fewer friends (piers) than her husband does. This idea of Marge’s fondest aspiration is being a ditz or a “blue haired bimbo”.
OK this is another Einstein moment here. You whistle blowers, I know I violated one of the sacred axioms of the theory of relativity by talking about tachions and de-facto hyperspace. I should have said "And then a giant hand reaches down and slows time w a y - d o w n so that Special Relativity remains inviolate. But I didn't do that. I thought maybe I would use logic instead. My bad. Do you want to hear something funny? The whole special relativity formula was come up with by a guy named Lowitz or something, to try and get Maxwell's well established ether theory to hang together. Because of that other Michaelson-Moorley experiment where they concluded that ether didn't act like "wind". There was no "ether wind". This doesn't disprove the existance of ether, but only its manifestation of "wind" like you could measure with a weather vain. So I guess the natural question arises why Einstein would adopt a mathematical formula designed to protect an ether theory that was no longer credible? There is another mistake I have been making for over 35 years with special relativity. We are to ASSUME, no matter WHO we are that wherever WE are is absolutely stationary and IF there is movement, it is movement that slows time down. NO HOW are we to assume that there is ANYWHERE in the Universe where time moves faster than it moves right HERE, wherever HERE is. But suppose we make a mental leap in suspended belief. Suppose for instance if we adopt the axiom "If A is faster than B, this does not preclude B from being also faster than A at the SAME TIME". In like manner "IF B is faster than A, there is nothing wrong with at the SAME time that A is faster than B". If you accept this bit of refutation of classic logic, then the whole theory makes perfect sense. Suddenly instead of the doppler effect (which is only logical) you have time and space expanding and contracting and speeding up and slowing down. What we have in Special Relativity is the adoption of a highly complex theory, to replace a far simpler view of reality people used to have.
No comments:
Post a Comment