New Evidence Surfaces in 9 - 11 Conspiracy

Nobody likes the term "conspiracy theorist", and the term "Truther" is little better because it reminds people too much of "Birther". Actually there is no "mystery" any more. Yesterday's conspiracy theorists are standing on today's solid facts beyond dispute. Conspiracy theorists are not like some police liutennant that looks over a murder case he's trying to piece together and gets this nebulous feeling "things just don't add up". It's gone bay beyond just "not adding up". Yesterday I received an E mail from my brother pretty much removing all doubt. Vincent Bugliosi put out a book a few years ago saying that Bush, Chaney and Rumsfeld ought to be brought up on war crimes. But they also ought to be indicted for staging 9 - 11. And I'll go further than that. I believe President Obama ought to be indicted as an accessary after the fact, and as such he needs to be Impeached and removed from office. I'm going to give you a full bill of particulars at the end of this posting but right now let's just hit some of the highlights. First of all Osama Bin Laden was never put in the FBI most wanted list for master-minding 9 - 11. He had already been put on the list in 1999 and the charges do not include master-minding 9 - 11. This obviously explains President Bush's strange apathy every time he was asked about Bin Laden. We have since learned he may well have been working as a special agent on OUR side in Pakistan. I was scanning down the twelve items on this list and my eyes fixed on the one about Shankelfort, Pennsylvania or whatever field where Flight 93 went down. I was flabberghasted to learn that there IS no site there. There is a hole in the ground too small to have been made by a 767 that crashed. There was no plane. There was no luggage. There were no bodies at all and not one drop of blood has been recovered from the site. In fact Donald Rumsfeld claimed later on TV that "Flight 93 was shot down". Of course the "record" is that it Crashed. That's what we were all told. But this is still a lie within a lie. Because Flight 93 did not crash in Pennsylvania at all but rather around 10:45 Flight 93 is on record as having landed in Cleveland. There was talk of hijacking and all 200 passengers were taken to some room to be debriefed. And we don't know what happened to them. To add to this some lady by a lake back in Pennsylvania says that she did see a small plane bank and go down. When she tried to inform the FBI that it was not near the size of a 767 the FBI flatly told her she was "wrong", just like Men in Black or something. Even if our people shot down the plane, why didn't they just come out and inform us all that it was necessary and we all would have understood.

We come to the Ground Zero site itself and firemen say that there was "molten metal" - - existing in rivers under ground literally weeks after 9 - 11. The problem here is that jet fuel cannot possibly generate that kind of heat. Furthermore in German footage of the World Trade center- - shows a woman waving right through the hole in the building made by the jet. And unlike the Obama Birth Certificate- - - there is absolutely no evidence of computer fakery in this image. So people were alive in a building that was supposedly as hot as molten metal. Of course we have all seem the demolition (?) photographs. There was another building, the Solomon Brothers building, that also went down. However the collapse of this building was announced 30 minutes in advance in a BBC news report. And people have pretty much admitted this building was deliberately taken down by the government. But the most damning point is that a false explanation was being faboricated by the government as a cover-story for this take-down. Also the Solomon Brothers building was rebuilt and this has not been talked about by the news media because they want ground zero to be some "perpetual shrine' or something. We all got on the Chinese' case for not talking about their bullet train crashes except to here of the "heroism of those who came to help". But there is no talk at all of what CAUSED these trains to crash. This is how it is with 9 - 11. They made Flight 93 into a good movie and it "tells a good story". But whether it is actually the Truth is quite another matter.

Then we have the hijackers themselves. The report says that the nineteen hijacker bit was a myth. There were never than many. But that many were Saudi nationalists there is no dispute. What you don't know if that three of the hijackers turned up alive. They aren't telling you this in the media. Of course the whole Bush connection with the Saudis or how it's the Saudi Arabians that wanted Saddam Hussein taken out- - is also not discussed. Of course as to the whereabouts of Bush verses Chaney- - you know all the lies told here. Dick Chaney says he did not want the President returning to Washington. According to President Bush "I wanted to return to Washington but all the phone lines to Washington were down". Between THOSE two choices, Chaney's version is closer to the Truth- - but it was still not the truth.

Finally and most indicting of all is the whole NORAD contraversy. They day before 9 - 11 Bush, Chaney and Rumsfeld changed long standing FAA regulations. It's established fact that if a plane diverts from its course you'll have NORAD agents on its tail within twenty minutes ready to take down the plane if necessary. And yet the flight pattern of the 9 - 11 hijackers was so erratic that it would have generated multiple alerts of such a nature. But meanwhile for a two day period, from 9 - 10 to 9 - 12 Bush switched control of these matters from NORAD to Donald Rumsfeld personally. People are asked to believe that all the erratic flight paths were ignored. AND we are all asked to ignore that "a chain of errors" of a million to one probability all occured at once - where all of the military planes were about as far from Ground Zero as they could get. Some have said that someone was leading them in "false flag drills" or going on some super-abondance of "War Games" activities, such that when the real thing came, they wern't ready. This is not a matter of speculation but fact and AF pilots will testify to it. This obviously is a criminal "gross neglence" at the least. But "change" doesn't even enter into the picture. This whole thing was planned so the scenario that developed was a virtual certainty. And the media isn't talking about it. Even Thom Hartman is afraid to talk about this. It's probably because he wants to keep his job. Of course when you read the official 9 - 11 government report you get things like "The Comission IMAGINES this happening or imagins that happening. OK, here is the report as sent to me by my brother. I hope the links are all still live because obviously they are informative.

1. Why did the news agencies report that WTC 7 collapsed almost 1/2 hour before it did, even though it was not hit by a plane, only had a few floors on fire, and gave no indication that it was in any serious danger?
2. Why do we still believe the tale of the 19 hijackers when so many of the accused hijackers showed up ALIVE within days? And why do we still believe the fable of the 19 hijackers when the FBI admitted that they are not sure about either the identity of the hijackers or if there were any hijackers at all?
3. Why was WTC 7 rebuilt, reopened and reoccupied with no press attention? Wouldn't this be an important victory in American resolve and perseverance?
4. Why were the NORAD rules changed for the first time several weeks prior to 9/11, taking responsibility/authority for shooting down hijacked planes away from NORAD military command for the first time in its history, and given to a civilian, Donald Rumsfeld, and then returned to NORAD the day after 9/11?
5. Why would hijackers planning on attacking NY and Washington DC drive from Florida, pass both DC and NY, and drive all the way to Maine and hinge this huge operation on a connecting flight from Maine to Boston, where we are told they hijacked their plane? Why wouldn't they fly out of any of the airports that are visible from their targets, like Newark, La Guardia or JFK...or even some of the smaller local airports that would have given them a clear easy path to their target and reduce the amount of time that our air defense systems would have to stop them?
6. Who placed all of those put options on the airlines just prior to the event, as if they knew that the stock prices on those specific airlines would lose a huge amount of value?
7. Why did George W. Bush's Secret Service detail not rush the president to safety when it was evident that the nation was under attack? If the nation was under attack, and they did not know the scope of the attack, and the president's location was known, how did they not worry about being attacked in Florida?. Why did they act as if they knew that there was no threat? And why, when our nation was under attack, did the president not rush into action? If you say he was concerned about upsetting the children, you are the ultimate apologist. He could have told them that his mommy was on the phone and he had to see what she wanted. Our county was supposedly being attacked and he/they waited 20 minutes before they moved. This is the smoking gun of smoking guns.
8. Why did the FBI never list Osama bin Laden as being wanted for 9/11? Actually, we know this one...because they admitted that they had no evidence linking him to the event.
9. Why was their molten metal flowing under the wreckage of the WTC for months? No jet fuel can melt metal, and nothing explainable could melt that much metal and keep it hot enough to remain molten for a month.
10. How did a passport of one of the so called hijackers make it through the huge fireball and end up on the street?
11. Why have photos from the 80+ cameras confiscated at the Pentagon never been released?
12. Why did the airplane that supposedly crashed at Shanksville vaporize so that nothing remained, not bodies, not luggage, not metal, - nothing - for the first time in aviation history? However, we are told that even though the plane vaporized at Shanksville, a hand-written note from a hijacker was found.

Of course, there are so many more. We deserve the answers. We deserve the right to ask these questions in public forums like the corporate media....who will not touch them with the proverbial ten foot pole. We have gate keepers on the Internet who actively ridicule and dismiss anyone who dares to raise these questions. Will you be one of them? Or, after really thinking about them, will you hope that one day, when we know what went on before, during and after the attacks on 9/11, - we can all say: "I did not know this, but I'm now absolutely convinced that it is true." This was a link that my brother, Al sent me tonight. It was submitted without editorial comment.

ED RAWLANS TIRED OF DOING IT WITH MICHELLE BACHMAN

PULLS OUT DUE TO EXHAUSTION

Ed Rowlands jumped the Republican party in 1992 to work on the unsuccessful Ross Perot presidential campaign. After this, republicans welcomed him back into the fold. But then he headed up the Michelle Bachman presidential campaign. However since now he Bachman as no longer a viable Presidential candidate since Rick Perry came in and "sucked all the air out of the room" as far as the Tea Party nutcase vote is concerned, Rowlands now says he is "tired". He's 68 and so is sitting this one out. People say that the Republicans still don't have the nerve to put a woman at the top of the ticket. Sarah Palin was making speeches yesterday where she sounded like a candidate for President but she wont run. Palin worships the all mighty dollar too much and she's still pulling in a hefty salary from FOX news. Other Republicans who had gotten FOX salaries have quit when they declared for President. Now everybody is piling on Rick Perry for his record as a spender in Texas, saying that it was "accounting tricks" that enabled him to show such a rosy balance sheet. In other news apparently James Hoffa Jr delivered a speech yesterday when he spoke of "taking down these sons of bitches" referring to defeating certain office holders at the ballot box. Unfortunately FOX news clipped out the line about "at the ballot box" and left the implication that Hoffa was advocating killing people. Of course for all my contact with dead people I haven't heard so much as a peep from Jimmy Hoffa in 36 years. But apparently now they are saying that conservatives will say that President Obama should apologise personally for Hoffa's remarks. This would be just another effort to styfle frank speech, which we need more and not less of. As to the topic we didn't talk about yesterday, we may pick it up on Thursday. This is what the Federation refers to as the "Reyker Phenominum" We'll explain that one. We need to "set it up for you" so it makes sense. Now they are talking about Dominionism on the Stephanie Miller show. Of course I sense Dominionism is the coming thing among right wing theologians. It was a long standing doctrine that has always been condemned as Hericy in the past. But it wouldn't be the first time that yesterday's "Hericy" became today's foundational theological Truth.

NEW FROM CRY-TELL RECORDS!

Presenting "Guess Who I Was In a Previous Life", a collection of Dylan songs, glean from hints while scowering the internet on Sunday. These are a bunch of songs that all point to a previous life. Here is the partial line-up. Subteranian Homesick Blues, Ballad of Frankie Lee and Judas Priest, The Drifter's Escape, Santa Fe, Clothesline Saga, Percy's Song, Long Time Gone, Joey, Knocking on Heaven't Door. These last two are performed line on the "Dylan and the Dead" CD which I own. Of course I am known for singing "Knocking on Heaven's Door" at Green Harbor on open mike Kerioke day. We'll have a bunch of new shocks to your system on Thursday.