Turning Off the Magnet That Attracts Evil Forces

I watched Face the Nation for a bit- skipping to the portion with Dick Derbin and that Republican brunette lady Congressman, on the subject of immigration.  Now John Boehner is saying he reversed his position on immigration because he caucused and the group figured “We just can’t trust the President to enforce the law after his performance on Obama Care”.  This is so ironic considering if the President DID enforce the Affordable Care act to the limit, they’d have even more to complain about.   Some say that there is some cloistered or not so cloistered FORCE that is calling the shots and telling John Boehner how to act, and when he steps out of line he receives a fitting rebuke from said Force.   For liberals- - they tend to take a psychological approach to things like - - oppression, untword domination, bullying, unreasonable demands, and the like.  For instance they will inquire of the oppressor “Just what is it that you are lacking in life or feel deprived of, or in your own warped mind feel that the person you are oppression is DOING to you, whether he really is or not.  What fears drive you.  What is the thing you are AFRAID of the most, that fills you with udder Dread?  Is it “That Nigger in the White House?”.  Do you see Religion as some sacred cow whose rights are being ucerped by forces you know can’t defeat in a fair fight, so you have to invent some sinister motive why they are more popular than you- -and have to resort to conspiratorial thinking? “  But all of this “psychotherapy” assumes that the Oppressor is basically NORMAL and not so abberated there is no hope in finding ANY rational basis (no matter how distorted) for what he does.  In other words is the oppressor SO irrational there is not even a hypothetical Cause and effect relation where for instance you’d say “OK, would President Obama’s resignation “make it OK for you?”  Capish.   Devoid of facts you make them up like FOX news feels continually compelet to do  such as this fixation that “giving workers a break” will take jobs and sabotage the economy.  Most undisciplined MINDS have little tolerance for actually tracing Cause verses Effect.

This is Monday February 10, 2014 and yesterday was kind of a jinxy day.  It’s after breakfast.  A strange story flashed across ABC news this morning President Obama plans on launching another Drone attack to “take out” a US citizen living in another country, and this country does not allow US planes to fly over their air space.  Is it just me or is this a prescription for trouble?   Apparently President Obama is asking the US justice department to eliminate this unnamed message who had “killed a US citizen in another country”.  This seems to me a prescription for war.  Is Ed Schultz right?  Is the real reason for attacking this unnamed nation with an unnamed target because we just want their Oil?   Of course I am as a rule against “Borrowing Trouble” and to avoid conflict where it is at all possible.  Some of these people such as Michal Benner (who admittedly I haven’t listened to in nearly twenty years) speaks of victims “attracting their assailents” in sort of a “blame the victim” game.  With this football player “coming out’ as gay, nobody would dare attack him because the media is on his side, and I wouldn’t have it any other way.  But for instance Mitt Romney and Larry Elder say that our “Border crossing crisis” stems from the fact that the United States is a “Magnet” and attracts others with our higher wages, and how as Mittens puts it “Somebody needs to turn off the magnet”.  If we only paid our workers a dollar twenty five- - as seems to be our goal anyhow with NAFTA then things would be just peachy keen.  Of course wouldn’t any of us pay a lot for a charm – talisman - - to wart off all hexes and curses like on that one Bewitched episode.  I have that Arab “Hanza” thing I got from Dr Levy.  Maybe I should start wearing it - - to ward off the “evil eye”.  They say that misquito repellant is in fact not a repellant- - but rather it just makes you invisible so the misquitos don’t know you’re there.  (Whatever works)  They say that sperm cells are “sensient” because they use their sense of smell to swim after the unfertilized ovum.  So that every thirteen year old buy is guilty of massive genocide.  I thought President Obama had given up this drone pursuit stuff anyhow.  We know he’s been more aggressive in Drone usage than President Bush was.  I find the whole development altogether disturbing.

While we all “wait” for this astrological prediction of mine to come to pass about “some new thing that will almost redefine you in some way- - may almost foist itself upon you, yet there is most likely a highly deceptive element to it.   I’ll give you two examples other than the Health Care ruling by the Supreme Court, which tea baggers may be right in thinking Justice John Roberts was under a horrible deception when he voted that way.  Had Justice Roberts gone the other way- - the Health Care Act would have died a quick and silent death never to be heard from again and as such would be “off the table’ as a campaign issue.  It is my belief that an adverse ruling at this time would actually have Helped president Obama because in the words of Bob Dylan “He would no longer have anything to live up to”.   All of this bullshit with the health care act roll-out now would not be happening.  But let’s look from John Lennon’s point of view at a very similar “geshtaldt” of an event.  John Lennon, when Brian Epstein died in late August of 1967,  saw a bleak future for the Beatles.  At least he is quoted as saying this.  But of course the “Replacement” for Epstein was the Maharishi - - and words about “just send Brian positive vibes” may be of dubious comfort.  From Lennon’s point of view he also had to worry about Paul assuming a leadership role of the Beatles in Epstein’s place.   In my own life in late August of 24 years later in 1991 - - and the advent of Clint- - who assumed a dominant presence, out of proportion to what normal expectations would indicate.  And Clint had this effect of undermining my relations, or so I feared, with Joe and Kathy, but most notably with Nicholas, where I felt I was being “eased out of the inner circle’ or whatever.  Like John Lennon, I felt as though I had suffered a loss of power, just as the tea party must have felt something very much like this when they learned that the horrid “Affordable Care Act” was still alive and well.

Well, now we learn why John Lennon may not have been too happy remembering February 9th fifty years ago.  Listening to the old Ed Sullivan tapes, it was clear that "She Loves You" and 'I Want to Hold Your Hand" were dominated by Paul's voice and John came off very weak.  The other three songs on that night were all Paul solo songs anyhow.  We learn they were having microphone problems in rehearsal and they thought they had the problem fixed, but apparently not because I still noticed it.  I watched that thing on George Martin on Saturday night.  It had a lot of his early life and how he got into classic music training “later in life” than most people so may have been less inclined to follow conventional rules.  He was invited to work at Abbey Road studios by EMI records and do comedy skits, and they are pretty corny.  Brian played him tapes of the Beatle’s music and George was not inclined to sign them, but that if they would travel down and perform in person he’d take another look at them.  Of course it was their personalities that impressed him.  They also played Jerry and the Pacemakers and Billy J Cramer music in this segment- - and Cilla Black doing a Dion Warwick song, “Anyone who had a heart”.   George of course put on a lot of “finishing touches” to Beatle songs.  However Ringo was really hurt for a long time when Martin said he was no good as a drummer.  But George Martin is still ticked off at whoever paid his salary because though 1963 was a banner year for Martin he was only paid $2,000 pounds a year, which is less than five thousand dollars American at those exchange rates then.  That’s somebody being really tight with their wallet.  John was very crass to Martin saying “We don’t want any of that production crap on the Get Back sessions”.   But strangely it was George and John who took the master tapes, apparently without Martin’s permission to Phil Specter, and Martin said ‘They should label the album Produced by George Martin - - Over Produced by Phil Specter”.  That would be putting Specter in his place.  Glen Johns was the guy at the board anyhow on the Get Back sessions, wasn’t he?   At about twenty to nine we watched ice dancing at the Olympics, and somewhere around ten after nine I began dial twirling.   Earlier in the evening it was the usual ABC game shows.  We had some casserole that almost came up to the level of spaghetti, and corn and a green salad.  I think we had tapioca pudding for desert.

I want to as it were slice the peach really thin on some “science” examples you may have read about in prior blog postings.  In late June of 2012 I make reference to three objects - - - all initially equal distant from the viewer.  The left one is receding, the middle one is stationary and the one on the right is coming tword you or approaching.  Einstein would say “all three are simotanious but time gets distorted and we see the three objects at different times”.  And I disputed that.   First of all - - for the receding object, as I explained - - optical distances appear shorter than they are simply because in depth perception it takes varying lengths of time for light to hit the eye-ball.  So as I stated then- - the object on the left will appear closer- - then it in fact is at the time the light was sent.  The one on the right will appear further away - - then it was at the time the light was sent.  BUT - - for that light that was sent “right on the equidistant line” there is no problem.  All three rays of light from THAT exact point- - will in fact hit your eyeball at the same time and from the point of view of YOU and NOT the object- - the light will be “seen” or measured as traveling at exactly the same speed.  Capish?   Now let’s do the Romulan hose gag we talked about several weeks ago.  Viewed from inside “encrypted” space - - where the end of the hose is- - the water initially coming out will also be cloaked, of course- - and will be seen inside cloaked space because the water is the SAME encryption altarothm as the space.  But once the water hose stream passes the threshold of cloaked space- - - as we said with solid object “Where it goes no one knows”.  It can no longer be viewed from inside cloaked space because the water is no longer INSIDE cloaked space.  But neither can the water stream be seen EITHER from inside or outside of cloaked space- - be seen from NORMAL space.  The hose stream liquid is still cloaked and will remain “spontaneously” cloaked till the effect wears off with time.  However once this cloaked water HITS a solid object- - the overwhelming physical contact with solid uncloaked material- - will cause this cloaked water to fall OUT of encryption- - and as such will get the recipient of the water - - -WET.  I hope this clears things up.