I
would like to meditate on the word “flip”.
You’ve no doubt heard of flipping elections, usually by a rig voting
machine from blue to red. People on the
right wing claim they don’t believe all of these “issues polls” that come out
on opinions on such things as immigration and gun control legislation and the
minimum wage. They are fond of saying
“the only votes that count are the ones case on election day. Yes- by 36% of Americans. But what about the other nearly two thirds of
Americans? Aren’t they entitled to be
represented too? But this whole concept
of “flipping” goes back to computers and these cosmic rays with “neutrinos”. Because once they strike a magnetic surface
they “flip” a bit from zero to one. So
it’s like those old DOS books where you use the COMP DISC command of “This is a
sample test” and then compare it with disk B of “This is a simple test” and the
thing comes back with error in one bit.
So the OJ defense team was not entirely wrong. Sometimes bits can be flipped to actually
spell out other intelligent messages like changing an A to an I. Dr
Phil would use “flipping” to change a parent’s relation with their child. I remember one girl that got pregnant and had
a baby at age fifteen. Suddenly she was
a slut who couldn’t be trusted as far as you could throw a bowling ball. Or a son who was on drugs- - even when he
gets OFF drugs he’s still just as mistrusted by parents who have been
“flipped”. But we use that term with
whole states- such as governors and their legislative houses, which can be
“flipped” and start voting out amazing laws- - usually giving tax breaks to
giant corporations such as Wall Mart- - and at the same time breaking their
word to people in pension funds such as firemen, police officers, teachers, and
government workers. Somehow the Biblical
idea of “When you give you word you should live up to it” has been thrown out
the window. This whole concept for
example of divorcing gay marriage as an issue of the right wing is a sign of
“flipping”. Suddenly being gay is hunky
dory- - because after all if you had to weed out all the gay republicans it just
wouldn’t be worth the embarrassment. But long held concepts can be “flipped”. Such as the idea that a judge - - magistrate
- - justice - - - should be above reproach and detached from the ordinary
political life and kind of do this ivory tower thing where they enter into this
conclave away from distractions and then render their verdicts. This is always how I pictured it
working. But clearly I’m behind the
times. Now they sent these judges off to
these right wing indoctrination seminars.
It would be illegal for the Koch Brothers to directly “lobby” a justice
to render a decision in his favor. But
it’s just fine if you get an all expence trip to some secluded spot in the
hills of West Virginia or something and told of the joys of strip mining- - and
other ways to ravage the environment- - or ways to screw employees who aren’t
in a union any more because of last year’s Union busting. So the whole Biblical concept of “Let justice
roll down from the hills like rivers” we talked about last time- - is pretty
much out the window. The Bible said to
neither favor a rich person in his judgement- - nor favor a poor person in
his. The Bible says to not take a
Bribe. And the Bible also says
something like “Don’t council together to do Evil”. (Selah)
Bill
Carrol said the other day something - - picture a guy who just spent three
weeks on a mountain top in Tibet and he comes back with this Truth. “People don’t become different as they get
older; they become MORE of who they really ARE”. And you might say, “How profound!” and when
asked what that means you say “Simply this - - - People Don’t Change”. This is certainly the Neil Savedra mantra
from day one, which kind of makes the whole existence of the Jesus Christ show
rather pointless, doesn’t it? I mean, why
tune in if I know ahead of time I’m never going to be changed (presumably for
the better) by the show. Pastors have
used that marriage and divorce statistic as a baseball bat to hit members of
their congregation over the heads for decades.
And yet the mantra of how one out of every two marriage ends in divorce-
- isn’t true, and it hasn’t been true for a long time. And we’re just now finding out about it. The divorce rate actually peaked in the mid
eighties- - thirty years ago. Now the
overall divorce rate per marriage is that 42% of all marriages end in
divorce. But the facts are more
dramatic because this is the overall rate over thirty years. Marriages that are happening right now have
only a one in three chance of ending in a divorce court. The reasons may be less spiritual but more to
do with the culture doesn’t expect people, particularly young women to get
married. People are visiting more
computer dating web sites being more systematic about how they pick their
mates. It could also be that since
people are older they are more realistic and not expecting such fantastic
things from their mates in terms of their “fulfilling every happiness” but
learn to generate happiness for themselves.
The
“Ring of Fire” series is always a cavalcade of horrors, and they usually put
out a new episode on Thursday mornings.
In addition to the Koch Brothers buying judges- a lot of time was spent
attacking the Clintons, Bill and Hillary.
Hillary is going around now claiming she’s a populist or “just one of
you people”. I’m still a little unsure
how Hillary can say “We were flat broke when we left the White House’ and yet
be multi millionaires today. There was
a lot of talk about the Clintons being friendly tword Wall Street and hiring
people like Larry Summers and being cozy with Alan Greenspan, who once joked
saying “Bill Clinton was the favorite republican President I worked with”. Actually the show this week was a little
long on rhetoric and short on specifics.
None of the major rollbacks of Wall Street regulations in the late
nineties were ever talked about. But a
lot of the stuff we think originated with President Obama actually started
under Clinton such as the CEO ratio to the grunt worker’s salary taking off
into the stratosphere. And contrary to
what Thom Hartman says- - through a lot of the Clinton years the poor weren’t
much better off. Of course they ended
AFDC as we know it. (American Families
with Dependent Children) This is a
program that had been around since the thirties, but it took on such a bad rap
of welfare mothers hatching kids out of wedlock just to get more government
payments- - that they had to end the thing, or at least Clinton did- to get
reelected in 1996. And now we hear that
Newt Gingrich and Bill Clinton were really two peas in a pod and when you came
down to it, didn’t view things that differently. But
the most damning indictment against the Clintons on today’s show was the notion
that were it not for the Monica Luinsky affair derailing the whole effort in congress
- - that the Clintons were both all for privatizing Social Security. This is something we usually associate as a
failed effore around 2005 in congress with President Bush. But if the Clintons were really secretly for
this major “overhaul” than I am truly shocked!
But
the other thing “Ring of Fire” talked about was the relation with the big drug
companies to the Food and Drug administration.
The show says “The FDA is nearly useless now in terms of protecting the
American people from bad drugs. Often
doctors are lobbied into performing skewed tests that make a drug look safe and
effective when it is neither. And they
get kickbacks from the drug manufacturers.
And of course there is the equivalent of “The Peach Tree Street”
legislation. This is- - using a cheap
guimic to screw someone over. Here the
cheap guimic is - - “Well you can get a generic drug if you want to, but you
have no right to sue them if something awful befalls you or your loved ones”. So- - they as much as tell you ‘Yeah I can
proscribe a generic if you really insist but just remember every time you’re
taking your life in your hands”. But of
course a lot of the time- - the big drug companies just buy out the generic
drug companies- - after the fourteen year patten is expired. If I were President I’d propose a Taft
Hartley style “cooling off period” type of law.
But instead of ninety days- - I’d make the “cooling off” period as long
as the original patten. Let me
explain. If a patent ran for fourteen
years, then I would make the “cooling off” period another fourteen years. This is where- - the big drug companies would
be BARRED BY LAW from making or accepting any offer for a buy out of a smaller
drug company. The theory in my
imaginative brain is simple. Because
there is an “adjustment period” after the patent runs out. Kind of like an “assimilation period” for
immigration to the United States that Pat loves so to talk about. In this case it would be “an opportunity to
assimilate the new economic balance without making any rash decisions in the
short term you may come to regret in the long run.
The
news in Law Enforcement is that they let unsuitable cops apply to various
police departments, such as in Cleveland, who are rejected by other departments
either from an emotional melt down or some racial incident where they were
deemed unsuitable for law enforcement.
They don’t state have any statewide equivalent of the California Medical
Board for example where you lose your license.
This officer involved in the shooting of the twelve year old boy with
the toy gun- - was fired from a police department in a smaller town. But some cities like Tupulo, Miss do it
right. They have rigorous psychological
profiling you have to pass if you’re going to work there. Sometimes even someone like Scott Walker can
do a good deed in signing this law recently which states that upon charges of
officer misdeeds, an special prosecutor is called in and a whole fresh Grand
Jury is convened expressly for the purpose of determining guilt or innocence in
this case, which doesn’t have an ongoing, working relation with Law
Enforcement. This is something many say
should be a general practice, to have an outside party handle legal disputes
with the police all the time.
Some have suggested that the kitchen staff in restaurants need to get tips also from the patrons. Others have suggested that the waitresses share their tips with those who prepare the food. One chef deserved a tip. He was concerned about GMO's in the food he serves to his customers, and says "I want to know what I'm serving my patrons", and put these sentaments in a letter to his congressman demanding that the FDA take action against genetically modified organisms, which they have refused to do. It's almost a law that the FDA's strange decision here cannot be overrules or appealed to a higher authority. Well, I'm appealing to a higher authority. I'm doing the Hebrew National Hot dog thing, you know? "God's gona get you for that" is my message to the FDA, to revive an old Bee Arthur expression.

No comments:
Post a Comment