I am reposting this article with little comment. What you want to know now is my take on all of this. Well, remember that Einstine's "Doctrine" is that photons "spontaniously gain mass" from travel, which lack it standing still. To me this violates a basic perameter of Basic physics. Here is a way perhaps to stick Einstein in the trash can and come up with something more sensible. The idea of calling it a "God" particle is intriguing because as you'll only hear right here- - - God is the Ultimate Materialist Being. In fact there is no use for God whatsoever in the psychic, or if you will, the karmic realm. As you know I invoke what I call the 'Marcion wall of Separation" between the karmic world and the material world. Items in the karmic world lack not only mass but also spacial gemoetry as we commonly know it- - and also any sense of "time as a river" but rather view time in pixelated or "moment by monent" form. I wanted to comment on one thing you may be puzzled about before we get to the long article, transcribed with some minimal editing. We talked about meeting other psychic beings in a common "theater". You Math whizzes will note that two "planes" meet in a line, so what you want to know is "then you'd be completely "lined in" wouldn't you? No. Part of the problem is to keep your "metaphore formats" straight. Those "lines" ARE the "theater" or the football field or the chess board. Someone can be in your "theater" you two have in common. You may have a common "theater" with another being AT THE SAME TIME, of course. This would represent- changing the metaphore a bit, to a board game of RISK where the troops are different colored pieces. What consists of a dot in one format is a "Theater" in another format. You can rightly deduce that you can be at two different intersecting 'lines" (the LINE is the form intersecting planes take) at the SAME TIME. Keep in mind- - geometry in the psychic world is not literal Spacial geometry as we know it. Some of you are also curious about Tangents saying "tangents in geometry rise way above one". Yes- - - but we here are talking about the "actualization" or "percentage of equity" tangent. This CANNOT rise above one because the person - - back around 1900 who devised the formula - - made the formula so that it virtually "self destructs" when any entry above ONE is entered. The formula goes crazy, as you know if you've tried it in EXCEL. Therefore since something CANNOT exist it DOES NOT exist- - and you CANNOT exist above a 45 degree incarnation plane, we have discussed previously. Now here is the "God Particle' article. MORE DIRECT APPLICATION OF DISCOVERY Many have said that this is the "root universe particle". They are in large measure right. For instance the famous "circle" equation in trigonometry is useful because of its close connection to the Pythagorean equation, which is useful in a lot of stuff. In The Same Manner - - - We now have discovered the ESSENTIAL PARTICLE of the Universe, if I read the media tea leaves right. They say this particle "passes through your fingers like moon light" in kind of a misplaced metaphore. However it is an over-extrapelation to say this particle PROVES the big bang. The best you can say it is USEFUL to the Big Bang theory, provided the theory itself is Proven. If NOT proven, then you don't have squat in this regard. In other words the Big Bang theory is not an "ESSENTIAL aspect of this particle. As I understand however the Properties of this particle embody ALL of the ESSENTIAL elements of material space we we know it. This is - - Mass, Spacial geometry, and Gravity. The addage is proven that - - "the nature of Mass determines the nature of the Space around it. It could be used to explain how photons "slow down" and give the Illusion of the Expanding Universe. If it is an Illusion, then the Big Bang is also an - - Illusion. This is my belief. The impitus for the Big Bang lies on the eronious "Meme" or belief that Infinity is Too Big an entity for even God to Create. I disagree. Back to the whole guitar down tuning thing for a minute- - - which is a ratio of the fourth root of Two - - - (to be precise) or the tweith root of two to the third power (also acceptable) the Big Truth that has gone unspoken here is the cries of nymphomaniacs everywhere. Two words: Size Matters. THE GOD PARTICLE explains how a mass-less particle such as the photon can "pick up mass". It merely "snags" a bunch of these "God Particles". If these God particles lack the SAME forward vector as the original Photon- - they will have the effect of slowing it down. But this slowing is only noticible after tens of millions of light-years, so it isn't really marked. It could be argued (as least with my prejudice) that Only a Mass-less Particle is effected by the "Viscosity" (there's that word again) of these God Particles.
THE GOD PARTICLE NEWS ARTICLE
“I think we have it,” said Rolf-Dieter Heuer, the director general of CERN, the multinational research center headquartered in Geneva. The agency is home to the Large Hadron Collider,
the immense particle accelerator that produced the new data by
colliding protons. The findings were announced by two separate teams.
Dr. Heuer called the discovery “a historic milestone.” He and others said that it was too soon to know for sure, however,
whether the new particle is the one predicted by the Standard Model, the
theory that has ruled physics for the last half-century. The particle
is predicted to imbue elementary particles with mass. It may be an
impostor as yet unknown to physics, perhaps the first of many particles
yet to be discovered. That possibility is particularly exciting to physicists, as it could
point the way to new, deeper ideas, beyond the Standard Model, about the
nature of reality.
For now, some physicists are simply calling it a “Higgslike” particle. “It’s something that may, in the end, be one of the biggest observations
of any new phenomena in our field in the last 30 or 40 years,” said Joe
Incandela, a physicist of the University of California, Santa Barbara,
and a spokesman for one of the two groups reporting new data on
Wednesday. Here at the Aspen Center for Physics, a retreat for scientists,
bleary-eyed physicists drank Champagne in the wee hours as word arrived
via Webcast from CERN. It was a scene duplicated in Melbourne,
Australia, where physicists had gathered for a major conference, as well
as in Los Angeles, Chicago, Princeton, New York, London and beyond —
everywhere that members of a curious species have dedicated their lives
and fortunes to the search for their origins in a dark universe. In Geneva, 1,000 people stood in line all night to get into an
auditorium at CERN, where some attendees noted a rock-concert ambience.
Peter Higgs, the University of Edinburgh theorist for whom the boson is
named, entered the meeting to a sustained ovation.
Confirmation of the Higgs boson or something very much like it would
constitute a rendezvous with destiny for a generation of physicists who
have believed in the boson for half a century without ever seeing it.
The finding affirms a grand view of a universe described by simple and
elegant and symmetrical laws — but one in which everything interesting,
like ourselves, results from flaws or breaks in that symmetry. According to the Standard Model, the Higgs boson is the only
manifestation of an invisible force field, a cosmic molasses that
permeates space and imbues elementary particles with mass. Particles
wading through the field gain heft the way a bill going through Congress
attracts riders and amendments, becoming ever more ponderous. Without the Higgs field, as it is known, or something like it, all
elementary forms of matter would zoom around at the speed of light,
flowing through our hands like moonlight. There would be neither atoms
nor life. Physicists said that they would probably be studying the new particle
for years. Any deviations from the simplest version predicted by current
theory — and there are hints of some already — could begin to answer
questions left hanging by the Standard Model. For example, what is the dark matter that provides the gravitational scaffolding of galaxies? And why is the universe made of matter instead of antimatter? “If the boson really is not acting standard, then that will imply that
there is more to the story — more particles, maybe more forces around
the corner,” Neal Weiner, a theorist at New York University, wrote in an
e-mail. “What that would be is anyone’s guess at the moment.” Wednesday’s announcement was also an impressive opening act for the
Large Hadron Collider, the world’s biggest physics machine, which costs
$10 billion to build only began operating two years ago. It is still
running at only half-power.
Physicists had been icing the Champagne ever since last December. Two
teams of about 3,000 physicists each — one named Atlas, led by Fabiola
Gianotti, and the other CMS, led by Dr. Incandela — operate giant
detectors in the collider, sorting the debris from the primordial
fireballs left after proton collisions. Last winter, they both reported hints of the same particle. They were
not able, however, to rule out the possibility that it was a statistical
fluke. Since then, the collider has more than doubled the number of
collisions it has recorded. The results announced Wednesday capped two weeks of feverish speculation
and Internet buzz as the physicists, who had been sworn to secrecy, did
a breakneck analysis of about 800 trillion proton-proton collisions
over the last two years. Up until last weekend, physicists at the agency were saying that they
themselves did not know what the outcome would be. Expectations soared
when it was learned that the five surviving originators of the Higgs
boson theory had been invited to the CERN news conference. The December signal was no fluke, the scientists said Wednesday. The new
particle has a mass of about 125.3 billion electron volts, as measured
by the CMS group, and 126 billion according to Atlas. Both groups said
that the likelihood that their signal was a result of a chance
fluctuation was less than one chance in 3.5 million, “five sigma,” which
is the gold standard in physics for a discovery. On that basis, Dr. Heuer said that he had decided only on Tuesday afternoon to call the Higgs result a “discovery.” He said, “I know the science, and as director general I can stick out my neck.”
I just talked to Pete Richards on the phone and we managed to have a nice 45 minute conversation without disintegrating each other with our Star Wars weapons. We did a pretty good job of avoiding politics. Today one individual made an ass of himself, and he's a friend of mine so I don't want to name him. He spoke of being in the "War" and fighting the dictator Chang Chi Check. I think he meant Ho Chi Min - - because I was wondering "When did we ever fight in Taiwhan?" Then he spoke of having this President Obama and saying "Thank god we have an election process here because we don't have to put up with all of this shit that President Obama is always pulling". If he thinks he's honoring US troops by denigrating a sitting US President, he is not. By the way Thom Hartman says that Supreme Court justice Samual P Chase or whatever- - - openly campaigned for John Adams in 1796 the year he was Chosen for Chief Justice or whatever of the High Court. But he then went on to openly criticize a sitting US President, Thomas Jefferson in this case- - by saying that he's one of those subversive Republicans ( ) who wants to extending voting rights to all white men, which would completely undermine our whole way of life in this country. Congress didn't take kindly to the denegration of a US President and the House voted to impeach a Sitting Justice for the Only time in our history- - but the impeachment vote failed to get a two-thirds vote in the US Senate.
Will Horton is playing with fire by openly threatening a man who can have you killed with one phone call or abducted and shipped off to Devil's Island and never heard from again. Clearly he's had too much of that "courage in a bottle". Some would say "He got too greedy' and that may be a fitting epitaf on his gravestone. Will Horton went from a nerd teenager too backward to get it on with a girl- - to now thinking he's a regular "player' in the Big Boys World. He's Delusional!
No comments:
Post a Comment