Standing on the Shoulders of Giants

First of all let me say that I do owe a lot to other people for all their research on so many other matters including Thom Hartman, Stephanie Miller, John Fugelsang, Hal Sparks, Randy Rhodes, and even Mike Meloy occasionally - - though he is given to "taking the Lord's name in vain a little too often".  I'm not smart enough to come up with all the stuff I post about on my own, and the time spent in research by others is invaluable.  It was Isac Newton that first used the expression "If I appear smarter than anybody else it's only because I have stood on the shoulders of giants.  John Lennon once said "You'd be amazed at all of the stuff I've incorporated from others in my songs".  Personally I don't think it's all that much from others, but that's his oppinion.  One other thing I've learned from John Lennon is that at times his Evolution on a particularly subject has been ahead of my own and 'I just wan't THERE yet". One of the Lennon lines that is like a burr in my saddle- - is the one directed to Pete Best saying "He just didn't grow like the rest of us".  As you know I have portrayed myself as a guy who "left the Beatles" a few days before Christmas of 1960.  Stewart Sutcliffe when he died also "left the Beatles" prior to Ringo's arriving, in April 1962 so both of us might be accused of "not having grown".  It came to my attention that when I was talking about those "psychic planes' that Venn Diagrams would have fit in nicely as a device to get my points accross.  Also this whole "six degrees of separation" thing would come in nicely.  There are only two degrees between myself and the animator who did a lot of the Fantasia movie because in 1990 Bill Gunderson shook hands with this woman, when she had by then to be pretty old, and then he shook hands with me.  That's only two degrees of separation, not six.  But I have always regarded Venn diagrams is some concept taught your Kindergarten teacher as a means of telling the kids that "you should be more inclusive".  Another little thing I didn't way was this whole idea of "going through stages or steps".  As Pastor Mark used to say, so I guess I owe this to him, is that Life is a progression of Steps.  And we STAY at a particular Step untill we "pass the test" so we can move on to the next step.  This image could also be used for computer linear programs and computer itteration loops.  So you stay in one "theater of engagement" presumably till you win or lose the battle, or perhaps it's a Mexican stand-off.  Of course the whole "crossing your path" or "our paths separating' or whatever is a good analogy- - but it goes against my "straight karmic line' imigry, so I didn't use that one.  Also I didn't mention the Aries Mu group is a group that's big on "tuning down".  Tuning down- - in analogy is more like shifting into a HIGHER gear ant not a lower one.  It's a way of getting more bang for your buck.  One might say that Viagara puts your dick in Overdrive, and hopefully it doesn't get stuck there, or you don't go blind or whatever.  But also- - and here you kind of have to trust me.  I owe Ideas to dead people.  For instance I was musing one day "I could have never written Beatle music of the sixties because I'm just not that smart".  And John Lennon twittered in with a four word sentense of, "Don't Sell Yourself Short".  Also on the whole ether wave length thing- - Mal Evans and I were talking ant Stewart came in seeing the whole topic made me uneasy said to me "This whole thing is to a degree a naturally occurring phenomonon.".  And he mentioned the psychic "doppler effect" and the implication is psychic stuff was Ether dependant, which it isn't really.  But there is still a sort of Ether after-affect, where one is able to "expand" once one has overcome a crisis or opponet.  Newton is supposed to have discussed the God particle or at least theorized its existance.  Perhaps you've figured out that I believe the God Particle is in fact what I refer to as Ether, which transcends everything in this material Universe.  For the most part it has neither mass nor viscosity.  But just like when you weigh something on a scale- - the fifteen pounds per square inch of air pressure does not register- - so the Ether all around us like Water- - does not register as Mass.  But just as with zero degrees ferenheit- - - a refraction index of Zero really isn't zero after all- - because you can go below zero as a numeric quantitative calibration, like Excel takes kurtosis below zero but Wolframalpha does not.  I suppose you may wonder how one can say both "The particle IS gravity" and yet the particle has virtually no mass.  By the way I know that photons are said by Einstein to GET their mass because all Energy has mass that can be quantified.  I was aware of this- - but it's kind of a tricky concept for me.  The idea of "Energy" being some isolated quantity or entity aside from its Means of production, is a concept I have real trouble grasping, though Sci Fi movies obviously have no problem with it.

I got Stephanie Miller on current TV.  But my advice is don't click the Live Link in Google listing.  You get three or four things at once, you can't get rid of it, your computer will spontaniously reboot, and you will see the most graphic forms of pornography on your screen.  Go to the static site and work from there.  I bagged four photograph from the KTLK studios where Stephanie Miller was doing her program.  Well, Dr. Levy will be here this afternoon for the first time in exactly four weeks, and so if I miss Randy Rhodes' return, that will be why.  Personally I think I'd rather be listening to Randy.